Already purchased this program?
Login to View
This video program is a part of the Premium package:
Analysis of the Influence of Diffeomorphic Normalization in the Prediction of Stable vs Progressive MCI Conversion with Convolutional Neural Networks
- IEEE MemberUS $11.00
- Society MemberUS $0.00
- IEEE Student MemberUS $11.00
- Non-IEEE MemberUS $15.00
Analysis of the Influence of Diffeomorphic Normalization in the Prediction of Stable vs Progressive MCI Conversion with Convolutional Neural Networks
0 views
+0
We study the effect of the selection of diffeomorphic normalization in the performance of Spasov's deep-learning system for the problem of progressive MCI vs stable MCI discrimination. We considered different degrees of normalization (no, affine and non-rigid normalization) and two diffeomorphic registration methods (ANTS and BL PDE-LDDMM) with different image similarity metrics (SSD, NCC, and lNCC) yielding qualitatively different deformation models and quantitatively different degrees of registration accuracy. BL PDE-LDDMM NCC achieved the best performing accuracy with median values of 89%. Surprisingly, the accuracy of no and affine normalization was also among the highest, indicating that the deep-learning system is powerful enough to learn accurate models for pMCI vs sMCI discrimination without the need for normalization. However, the best sensitivity values were obtained by BL PDE-LDDMM SSD and NCC with median values of 97% and 94% while the sensitivity of the remaining methods stayed under 88%.
We study the effect of the selection of diffeomorphic normalization in the performance of Spasov's deep-learning system for the problem of progressive MCI vs stable MCI discrimination. We considered different degrees of normalization (no, affine and non-rigid normalization) and two diffeomorphic registration methods (ANTS and BL PDE-LDDMM) with different image similarity metrics (SSD, NCC, and lNCC) yielding qualitatively different deformation models and quantitatively different degrees of registration accuracy. BL PDE-LDDMM NCC achieved the best performing accuracy with median values of 89%. Surprisingly, the accuracy of no and affine normalization was also among the highest, indicating that the deep-learning system is powerful enough to learn accurate models for pMCI vs sMCI discrimination without the need for normalization. However, the best sensitivity values were obtained by BL PDE-LDDMM SSD and NCC with median values of 97% and 94% while the sensitivity of the remaining methods stayed under 88%.
Cart
Create Account
Sign In