Linear Mixed Models Minimise False Positive Rate and Enhance Precision of Mass Univariate Vertex-Wise Analyses of Grey-Matter

This video program is a part of the Premium package:

Linear Mixed Models Minimise False Positive Rate and Enhance Precision of Mass Univariate Vertex-Wise Analyses of Grey-Matter


  • IEEE MemberUS $11.00
  • Society MemberUS $0.00
  • IEEE Student MemberUS $11.00
  • Non-IEEE MemberUS $15.00
Purchase

Linear Mixed Models Minimise False Positive Rate and Enhance Precision of Mass Univariate Vertex-Wise Analyses of Grey-Matter

0 views
  • Share
Create Account or Sign In to post comments
We evaluated the statistical power, family wise error rate (FWER) and precision of several competing methods that perform mass-univariate vertex-wise analyses of grey-matter (thickness and surface area). In particular, we compared several generalised linear models (GLMs, current state of the art) to linear mixed models (LMMs) that have proven superior in genomics. We used phenotypes simulated from real vertex-wise data and a large sample size (N=8,662) which may soon become the norm in neuroimaging. No method ensured a FWER
We evaluated the statistical power, family wise error rate (FWER) and precision of several competing methods that perform mass-univariate vertex-wise analyses of grey-matter (thickness and surface area). In particular, we compared several generalised linear models (GLMs, current state of the art) to linear mixed models (LMMs) that have proven superior in genomics. We used phenotypes simulated from real vertex-wise data and a large sample size (N=8,662) which may soon become the norm in neuroimaging. No method ensured a FWER